Science textbooks have been trying hard to include photographs of multi-gendered, multi-cultural scientists. But has our image of the "scientist" really been affected by these attempts at equity? Today I Google-imaged "scientist" just to see what I would get.
There are a couple of things I noticed immediately about these results.
There are a couple of things I noticed immediately about these results.
- Our collective image of the "scientist" wears a lab coat. Only one of the 33 pictures on the first page of results is not wearing one.
- The color scheme of our collective "scientist" is apparently blue, green and white.
- Of 33 pictures on the first page of results, 7 of them include women. 2 of those pictures with women come from a the same web comic, and are actually jokes, leaving five serious depictions of women in science.
- In the 33 pictures of scientists in the first page of results, there are 21 pairs of glasses.
- In 22 of the pictures on the first page of results a scientist is working with or displaying some kind of mysterious liquid in a test tube or beaker. In fourteen of these 22, the liquid is bubbling or smoking ominously.
- 3 of the 33 pictures on the first page of results depict a scientist who looks like they might possibly not be white. It's hard to tell. Two of those three questionably ethnic scientists are also women.
- At least nine of the scientists appear to be "mad."
- In the first two pages of results, there are only four real photographs of women "doing science." One of those four is a model in a lab coat and little else, shown below.